Geneva’s Silent Storm: What the ATP Director Isn’t Saying About Djokovic’s Return

In the hushed corridors of the ATP, a whisper lingers: Novak Djokovic’s return to the Geneva Open isn’t just a wildcard entry—it’s a calculated move that unsettles the very foundation of tennis politics.

The Unspoken Tension

When Djokovic announced his participation in the 2025 Geneva Open, the tennis community erupted. Yet, amidst the applause, the ATP’s silence was deafening. Why was the governing body so reticent? Was it mere coincidence, or a deliberate absence of endorsement?

A Coaching Shuffle

Adding to the intrigue, Djokovic parted ways with Andy Murray, his coach for less than six months, citing unmet expectations. In his place, he appointed Dusan Lajovic, a former doubles partner, and Boris Bosnjakovic, an analyst. This sudden reshuffling begs the question: Is Djokovic’s quest for a 100th title a personal ambition, or a strategic move to challenge the ATP’s authority?

The ATP’s Calculated Silence

The absence of public support from the ATP raises eyebrows. Is this a subtle reprimand, or a tacit acknowledgment of Djokovic’s influence? The governing body’s silence may be its most telling statement yet.

A Legacy in the Balance

As Djokovic steps onto the clay courts of Geneva, aiming for his 100th ATP singles title, the stakes transcend personal achievement. This isn’t just about tennis; it’s about power, influence, and the future of the sport.

In the end, the ATP’s silence speaks louder than any endorsement could. Djokovic’s return isn’t just a comeback—it’s a statement. And the tennis world is watching, waiting for the next move in this high-stakes game.