“The NFL’s Top 100: Who Was Left Out and Why It Matters”

Pete Prisco’s 2025 NFL Top 100 list has ignited a firestorm of debate, particularly due to the omission of a Super Bowl-winning quarterback. This decision raises questions about the criteria used to evaluate players and what it means for the league’s evolving landscape.

The absence of this quarterback, who led his team to a championship, challenges traditional metrics of success. Is winning the ultimate measure of a player’s value, or do other factors play a more significant role? Prisco’s list suggests that performance metrics and individual statistics may outweigh team achievements in the eyes of some evaluators.

This controversy also highlights the growing influence of media personalities in shaping public perception of players. With platforms like CBS Sports amplifying their voices, figures like Prisco hold considerable sway over which players are celebrated and which are overlooked.

As the NFL continues to evolve, so too will the criteria for evaluating its players. The debate sparked by this omission serves as a reminder of the complexities involved in ranking athletes and the subjective nature of such lists.

In the end, the exclusion of this quarterback may be more telling than any ranking could be. It forces us to reconsider what truly defines greatness in the NFL.