Heung-min Son’s Omission: A Tactical Gamble or a Ticking Time Bomb?

The San Mamés stadium stood still as the final whistle blew, sealing a 1-0 victory for Tottenham Hotspur over Manchester United in the 2025 UEFA Europa League final. But beneath the surface of celebration, a question lingered: why was captain Heung-min Son, a player synonymous with Spurs’ identity, left on the bench?

Manager Ange Postecoglou’s decision to start Richarlison in place of Son raised eyebrows. Postecoglou justified the move, citing the need for “work rate and running power” in a high-pressure final . But was this a tactical masterstroke, or a risky gamble?

The match unfolded with intensity, and Spurs’ defensive resilience was tested. Guglielmo Vicario’s crucial saves and Micky van de Ven’s goalline clearance highlighted the team’s determination. Yet, the absence of Son’s leadership and attacking prowess was palpable.

As Tottenham clinched their first major trophy in years, the decision to bench Son sparked debates among fans and pundits alike. Was it a calculated risk that paid off, or a decision that could have cost them the title?

The Europa League final was more than just a match; it was a statement. In the world of football, where every decision is scrutinized, Postecoglou’s choice to bench Son will be remembered as a defining moment.

As the dust settles, one question remains: in the high-stakes world of football, how far can a manager push the boundaries of tradition and expectation?